XLE · State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
XLE tracks the Energy and returned +50.7% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Ticker | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | XOM | 20.13% | |
| CHEVRON CORP | CVX | 15.18% | |
| CONOCOPHILLIPS | COP | 6.36% | |
| MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP | MPC | 5.63% | |
| PHILLIPS 66 | PSX | 5.52% | |
| VALERO ENERGY CORP | VLO | 5.38% | |
| SLB LTD | SLB | 4.49% | |
| EOG RESOURCES INC | EOG | 4.15% | |
| WILLIAMS COS INC | WMB | 3.59% | |
| TARGA RESOURCES CORP | TRGP | 3.58% |
Compare XLE
Also against BIL, BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GARP, GDX, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, LYTE, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, REMX, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, SPYM, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +14.0% | +3.3% | +10.7 pts | +14.8 pts |
| 6 months | +14.4% | +16.0% | −1.6 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 1 year | +50.7% | +17.5% | +33.2 pts | +27.7 pts |
| 3 years | +54.1% | +77.9% | −23.7 pts | −40.9 pts |
| Since listing | +280.3% | +804.4% | −524.1 pts | −1393.6 pts |
In plain words
XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 24 positions, with the top ten at 74.0%.
| What it tracks | Energy |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Jan 28, 2026) | 0.08% |
| Price | $65.14 |
| Listed since | Jan 4, 2010 |
| Net assets (the issuer own daily fund list, as of Sep 10, 2026) | $42.6bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −0.3% |
| Holdings | 24 |
| Top ten weight | 74.0% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | Sep 10, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 100.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 97.0% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 5.4% |
Questions people ask
- How has XLE performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XLE returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +54.1%.
- What does XLE cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
- What does XLE hold?
- 24 positions as filed for Sep 10, 2026, with the top ten at 74.0% of the fund. 100% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is XLE below its high?
- 0.3% below its high of Sep 9, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Where XLE is written about
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLE, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/xle Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources