Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XLE: how they differ

MUB and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUBOnly in XLE
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.13%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 20.13%
DISTRICT COLUMBIA UNIV REV 0.10%CHEVRON CORP 15.18%
ECTOR CNTY TEX 0.08%CONOCOPHILLIPS 6.36%
NEW ORLEANS LA 0.08%MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 5.63%
PORT TACOMA WASH REV 0.08%PHILLIPS 66 5.52%
CONTRA COSTA CALIF CMNTY COLLE 0.06%VALERO ENERGY CORP 5.38%
LOS ANGELES CALIF 0.06%SLB LTD 4.49%
LOS ANGELES CNTY CALIF 0.06%EOG RESOURCES INC 4.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MUB and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
XLE
State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isNational Muni BondEnergy
Total return, 1 year+0.1%+50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.4 pts+33.2 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.08%
Holdings521524

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLE in plain words

XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 24 positions, with the top ten at 74.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLE?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLE?
MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XLE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XLE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-xle Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources