Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and MUB

Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.05%
MUB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; MUB is 13.9 times larger.

AOR vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORMUB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%−0.4%
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.9bn$54.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR MUB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks an index of National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.8% −0.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.05%
Holdings 7 7873
Net assets, AOR as of Oct 28, 2026 and MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.9bn $54.1bn

AOR and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or MUB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and MUB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or MUB?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-mub

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.