Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to XLE's +61.2%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and XLE
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 60.3 points; IWF is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +61.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $124.7bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 78.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and XLE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xle
[IWF against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.