Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and XLE

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+61.2%
XLE total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.08%
XLE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLE costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.2 points; XLE is 2.3 times larger.

PULS vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSXLE
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+61.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedEnergy Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$45.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund78.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS XLE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in XLE
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 23.98%
CHEVRON CORP 18.21%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 7.18%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 4.67%
PHILLIPS 66 4.41%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 4.26%
WILLIAMS COS INC 4.22%
EOG RESOURCES INC 4.07%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Energy
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +61.2%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Holdings 553 22
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $45.2bn

PULS and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and XLE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XLE

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XLE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XLE +61.2%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or XLE?
XLE is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xle

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.