Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and XLF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLF costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points; XLF is 2.6 times larger.
| Measure | PULS | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.8bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or XLF?
- XLF is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlf
[PULS against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.