Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XLV's +25.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and XLV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $47.0bn for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+25.6%
XLV total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.08%
XLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLV costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.6 points; XLV is 2.4 times larger.

PULS vs XLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSXLV
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+25.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedHealth Care Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$47.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS XLV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in XLV
ELI LILLY + CO 15.77%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 9.96%
ABBVIE INC 7.78%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 5.66%
MERCK + CO. INC. 5.38%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 3.94%
AMGEN INC 3.72%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 3.03%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Health care
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +25.6%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Holdings 553 62
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $47.0bn

PULS and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and XLV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XLV

XLV tracks an index of Health care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 62 positions, with the top ten at 60.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XLV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XLV +25.6%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or XLV?
XLV is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against XLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.