Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XOP's +62.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and XOP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $4.6bn for State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+62.5%
XOP total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.35%
XOP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 58.5 points; PULS is 4.3 times larger.

PULS vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSXOP
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+62.5%
Drawdown
Below its high24.8%, high on Jun 23, 2014
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$4.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS XOP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in XOP
RANGE RESOURCES CORP 3.48%
APA CORP 2.92%
MURPHY OIL CORP 2.89%
OVINTIV INC 2.85%
EOG RESOURCES INC 2.82%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.82%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 2.81%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 2.79%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +62.5%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.35%
Holdings 553 52
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $4.6bn

PULS and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PULS and XOP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

XOP

XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +62.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 24.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XOP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XOP +62.5%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or XOP?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against XOP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xop

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.