Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or XOP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or XOP?

ACWI charges 0.32% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs XOP: how they differ

ACWI and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWI	Only in XOP
NVIDIA 4.89%	PBF ENERGY INC CLASS A 3.89%
APPLE 4.67%	HF SINCLAIR CORP 3.27%
MICROSOFT 3.38%	DELEK US HOLDINGS INC 3.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%	VALERO ENERGY CORP 3.21%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%	MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 3.20%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%	PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC 3.12%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%	PHILLIPS 66 3.06%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%	CALUMET INC 2.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	MSCI ACWI	SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	+34.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.35%
Holdings	1630	54

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or XOP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or XOP?: ACWI charges 0.32% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against XOP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-xop Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources