Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and XLE
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $45.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.0 points.
| Measure | MINT | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +61.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 78.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MINT and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-xle
[MINT against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.