Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to XLE's +61.2%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and XLE

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+61.2%
XLE total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.08%
XLE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLE costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 58.6 points; XLE is 1.7 times larger.

CGGR vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRXLE
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+61.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedEnergy Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$45.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%78.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and XLE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR XLE
EOG Resources Inc 0.85% 4.07%
Diamondback Energy Inc 0.44% 2.01%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in XLE
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 23.98%
CHEVRON CORP 18.21%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 7.18%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 4.67%
PHILLIPS 66 4.41%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 4.26%
WILLIAMS COS INC 4.22%
SLB LTD 3.86%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Energy
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +61.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 99.8%
Holdings 96 22
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.9bn $45.2bn

CGGR and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLE

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or XLE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and XLE +61.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or XLE?
XLE is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and XLE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 100% of XLE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-xle

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.