Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and XLE
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; XLE is 5.7 times larger.
| Measure | PDBC | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | +61.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $8.0bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 78.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xle
[PDBC against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.