Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to XOP's +62.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and XOP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and $4.6bn for State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+62.5%
XOP total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.35%
XOP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XOP costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; PDBC is 1.7 times larger.

PDBC vs XOP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCXOP
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+62.5%
Drawdown
Below its high24.8%, high on Jun 23, 2014
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$8.0bn$4.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC XOP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in XOP
RANGE RESOURCES CORP 3.48%
APA CORP 2.92%
MURPHY OIL CORP 2.89%
OVINTIV INC 2.85%
EOG RESOURCES INC 2.82%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.82%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 2.81%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 2.79%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +62.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.35%
Holdings 1 52
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.0bn $4.6bn

PDBC and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC and XOP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

XOP

XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +62.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 24.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or XOP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and XOP +62.5%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or XOP?
XOP is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against XOP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-xop

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.