Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and PDBC
Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
AOR costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 47.8 points; PDBC is 2.1 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | +55.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.9bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 623 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: AOR against ACWI, Nov 21, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; PDBC against DBC, Nov 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026.
AOR returned more: +128.3% to +85.7%. AOR swung less: 10.3% to 18.0%. AOR fell less at its worst: −22.2% to −48.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | AOR | PDBC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +128.3% | +85.7% | AOR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.1% | +5.3% | AOR | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +69.5% | −17.2% | AOR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.3% | 18.0% | AOR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 7.3% | 12.3% | AOR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −22.2% | −48.3% | AOR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 53.1% | 98.9% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 70.7% | 99.6% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.64 | 0.99 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.77 | 0.98 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.51 | 0.26 | AOR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.73 | 0.38 | AOR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.124 | 0.047 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.32 | 0.11 | AOR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ACWI | DBC | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.5% a year | 0.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.36 | 0.02 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.3% to +3.3% | −1.5% to +1.5% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.42 | 0.00 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 8.6% | 2.6% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 623 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR and PDBC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. AOR follows 60/40 Balanced Allocation and PDBC follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AOR returned +7.8% and PDBC +55.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 47.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or PDBC?
- AOR is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-pdbc
[AOR against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.