Which returned more over the last year, AOR or BWET?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, AOR or BWET?

AOR charges 0.15% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs BWET: how they differ

AOR is an equity index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +11.3%.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

AOR and BWET on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Breakwave
What it is	Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation	Tanker Shipping
Total return, 1 year	+11.3%	+5129.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−6.2 pts	+5112.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	7	not filed

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or BWET?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or BWET?: AOR charges 0.15% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against BWET, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against BWET, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-bwet Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources