Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLE?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +15.0% and XLE +61.2%.

Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLE?

XLE is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

SIVR vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

SIVR is a commodity fund and XLE an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XLE returned +61.2% against +15.0%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SIVR and XLE

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF, and $45.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

SIVR on its own →XLE on its own →

At a glance

+15.0%

SIVR total return, 1 year

+61.2%

XLE total return, 1 year

0.30%

SIVR expense ratio

0.08%

XLE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLE costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 46.2 points.

SIVR vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	SIVR	XLE
Return
Measure	SIVR	XLE
Total return, 1 year	+15.0%	+61.2%
Drawdown
Measure	SIVR	XLE
Below its high	53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	SIVR	XLE
What it tracks	Silver	Energy Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Measure	SIVR	XLE
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.08%
Net assets, SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026	$3.7bn	$45.2bn
Holdings
Measure	SIVR	XLE
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		78.1%

Method

Side by side

SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer abrdn State Street

What it is Holds silver Tracks an index of Energy

Total return, 1 year +15.0% +61.2%

Its benchmark over the same days +14.9% (SLV) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SLV not measured

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.08%

Holdings not counted 22

Net assets, SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $45.2bn

SIVR and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

SIVR

Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLE

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SIVR or XLE?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SIVR returned +15.0% and XLE +61.2%.
Which is cheaper, SIVR or XLE?: XLE is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

SIVR vs VDE SIVR vs XOP IYE vs SIVR SIVR vs XLF USO vs XLE SLV vs XLE BWET vs XLE GLD vs XLE

Where to next

SIVR on its own →XLE on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →XLE dividend history →XLE holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

abrdn website ↗

XLE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XLE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SIVR against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sivr-vs-xle

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.