Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EMXC vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EMXC and XLE
Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $45.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.4 points; XLE is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | EMXC | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +33.8% | +61.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $26.4bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.2% | 78.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 4, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 481 weekly returnsXLE returned more: +211.7% to +122.9%. EMXC swung less: 19.2% to 30.7%. EMXC fell less at its worst: −40.7% to −63.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EMXC | XLE | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +122.9% | +211.7% | XLE | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.1% | +13.1% | XLE | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +80.5% | +111.2% | XLE | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.2% | 30.7% | EMXC | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.8% | 21.9% | EMXC | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −40.7% | −63.9% | EMXC | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.41 | 0.47 | XLE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.57 | 0.66 | XLE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.22 | 0.20 | EMXC (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 481 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EMXC and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMXC and XLE do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EMXC follows MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index and XLE follows Energy Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMXC returned +33.8% and XLE +61.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 27.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EMXC
EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EMXC or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EMXC against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EMXC against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-xle
[EMXC against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.