Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

URTH vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, URTH returned +13.1% to XLE's +61.2%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about URTH and XLE

Net assets: $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF, and $45.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
+61.2%
XLE total return, 1 year
0.24%
URTH expense ratio
0.08%
XLE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLE costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.1 points; XLE is 5.1 times larger.

URTH vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureURTHXLE
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+61.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI World IndexEnergy Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$8.8bn$45.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%78.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

3%

By the books each fund has filed, URTH and XLE hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first URTH XLE
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.82% 23.98%
CHEVRON 0.46% 18.21%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.20% 7.18%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.14% 4.67%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 0.13% 4.26%
PHILLIPS 66 0.12% 4.41%
WILLIAMS 0.10% 4.22%
EOG RESOURCES 0.09% 4.07%
SLB 0.09% 3.86%
KINDER MORGAN 0.07% 3.19%
ONEOK 0.07% 2.91%
TARGA RESOURCES 0.07% 3.12%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.07%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
Only in XLE
XAE ENERGY DEC26 0.01%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

URTH iShares MSCI World ETF XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI World Tracks an index of Energy
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +61.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.3 pts vs ACWI not measured
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 69.1% 99.8%
Holdings 1254 22
Net assets, URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.9bn $45.2bn

URTH and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

URTH and XLE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

XLE

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, URTH or XLE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URTH returned +13.1% and XLE +61.2%.
Which is cheaper, URTH or XLE?
XLE is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do URTH and XLE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 69% of URTH and 100% of XLE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, URTH against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/urth-vs-xle

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.