Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to XLE's +61.2%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and XLE
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 45.4 points; XLE is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +61.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 78.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returnsXLE returned slightly more: +116.6% to +107.2%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 26.8%. CGDV fell slightly less at its worst: −21.1% to −22.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGDV | XLE | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +107.2% | +116.6% | XLE (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.9% | +18.1% | XLE (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +93.0% | +84.3% | CGDV (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 14.8% | 26.8% | CGDV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.8% | 19.0% | CGDV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −21.1% | −22.6% | CGDV (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.85 | 0.60 | CGDV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.28 | 0.85 | CGDV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.80 | 0.80 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and XLE do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and XLE follows Energy Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and XLE +61.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 45.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xle
[CGDV against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.