Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and XLE

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $45.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+61.2%
XLE total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.08%
XLE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLE costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 62.6 points.

BOND vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDXLE
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+61.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedEnergy Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.08%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$45.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund78.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND XLE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in XLE
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 23.98%
CHEVRON CORP 18.21%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 7.18%
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 4.67%
PHILLIPS 66 4.41%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 4.26%
WILLIAMS COS INC 4.22%
EOG RESOURCES INC 4.07%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Energy
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +61.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.08%
Holdings 1565 22
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $45.2bn

BOND and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLE

XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or XLE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and XLE +61.2%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or XLE?
XLE is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-xle

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.