Which returned more over the last year, EMB or XLE?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or XLE?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs XLE: how they differ

EMB and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in XLE
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 20.13%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	CHEVRON CORP 15.18%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	CONOCOPHILLIPS 6.36%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 5.63%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	PHILLIPS 66 5.52%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	VALERO ENERGY CORP 5.38%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	SLB LTD 4.49%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	EOG RESOURCES INC 4.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	XLE State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Energy
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+33.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.08%
Holdings	612	24

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

XLE in plain words

XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 24 positions, with the top ten at 74.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or XLE?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or XLE?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against XLE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against XLE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-xle Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources