Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWX vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWX returned +14.3% to EMB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWX and EMB
Net assets: $17.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, and $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
ACWX costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points; ACWX is 1.4 times larger.
| Measure | ACWX | EMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $17.9bn | $13.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWX and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,939 positions, with the top ten at 15.6%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or EMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +14.3% and EMB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or EMB?
- ACWX is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-emb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWX against EMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-emb
[ACWX against EMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-emb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.