Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AOR vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to EMB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOR and EMBNet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.9bn for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and $13.2bn for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
AOR costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; EMB is 3.4 times larger.
| Measure | AOR | EMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.8% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | 60/40 Balanced Allocation | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $3.9bn | $13.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AOR and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or EMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and EMB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or EMB?
- AOR is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOR against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-emb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AOR against EMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-emb
[AOR against EMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-emb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.