MLPA vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MLPA and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned +52.5% over the year. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Global X MLP ETF, and $41.9bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
XLE costs 0.69 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 29.3 points.
| MLPA | XLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.77% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, MLPA as of Oct 9, 2026 and XLE as of Oct 8, 2026 | $2.3bn | $41.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.2% | +52.5% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 98.6% | 78.2% |
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Sep 9, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MLPA and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
MLPA and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MLPA in plain words
MLPA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.77% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 20 positions, with the top ten at 98.6%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
XLE in plain words
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +52.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MLPA or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MLPA returned +23.2% and XLE +52.5%.
- Which is cheaper, MLPA or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.69 percentage points a year. That is about $69 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MLPA against XLE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MLPA against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-xle
[MLPA against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.