MLPA vs MLPX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MLPA and MLPX hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and MLPX returned +24.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.3bn for Global X MLP ETF and $3.5bn for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF.
MLPX costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; MLPX is 1.5 times larger.
| MLPA | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.77% | 0.45% |
| Net assets | $2.3bn | $3.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.2% | +24.7% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 25% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 98.6% | 67.1% |
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Sep 9, 2026 | 6.1%, high on May 19, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MLPA and MLPX hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
25% in common
On the same fields
MLPA and MLPX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MLPA in plain words
MLPA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.77% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 20 positions, with the top ten at 98.6%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
MLPX in plain words
MLPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 28% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 29 positions, with the top ten at 67.1%. It sat 6.1% below its high of May 19, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MLPA or MLPX?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MLPA returned +23.2% and MLPX +24.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MLPA or MLPX?
- MLPX is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MLPA against MLPX, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-mlpx
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MLPA against MLPX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-mlpx
[MLPA against MLPX (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-mlpx)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.