Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
LQD vs XLE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LQD returned −3.4% to XLE's +61.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LQD and XLE
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $30.6bn for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and $45.2bn for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLE costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 64.6 points; XLE is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | LQD | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −3.4% | +61.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index | Energy Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $30.6bn | $45.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 78.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LQD and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
LQD and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LQD
LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLE
XLE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +61.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 22 positions, with the top ten at 78.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LQD or XLE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −3.4% and XLE +61.2%.
- Which is cheaper, LQD or XLE?
- XLE is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LQD against XLE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-xle
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). LQD against XLE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-xle
[LQD against XLE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-xle)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.