FXI · iShares China Large-Cap ETF
FXI tracks the China Large-Cap and returned −13.8% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H | 9.88% | |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING | 9.14% | |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS | 8.34% | |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF | 6.56% | |
| XIAOMI | 4.83% | |
| MEITUAN | 4.36% | |
| BANK OF CHINA LTD H | 4.32% | |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH | 3.80% | |
| NETEASE | 3.56% | |
| BYD H | 3.14% |
Compare FXI
Also against BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, GARP, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, SPYM, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | −1.5% | +3.3% | −4.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | −4.1% | +16.0% | −20.1 pts | −24.8 pts |
| 1 year | −13.8% | +17.5% | −31.3 pts | −36.8 pts |
| 3 years | +36.3% | +77.9% | −41.5 pts | −58.8 pts |
| Since listing | +18.5% | +804.4% | −785.9 pts | −1655.4 pts |
In plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
| What it tracks | China Large-Cap |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Nov 21, 2025) | 0.73% |
| Price | $34.49 |
| Listed since | Jan 4, 2010 |
| Net assets (the issuer own daily fund list, as of Sep 11, 2026) | $4.1bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −28.5% |
| Holdings | 53 |
| Top ten weight | 57.9% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | Sep 10, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 100.0% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 0.0% |
Questions people ask
- How has FXI performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, FXI returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +36.3%.
- What does FXI cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year.
- What does FXI hold?
- 53 positions as filed for Sep 10, 2026, with the top ten at 57.9% of the fund. 0% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is FXI below its high?
- 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Where FXI is written about
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/fxi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources