Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and FXI

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

COWZ costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.5 points; COWZ is 5.3 times larger.

COWZ vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.73%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$19.7bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −19.1%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.73%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 0.0%
Holdings 100 51
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 $19.5bn $3.7bn

COWZ and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ and FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or FXI?
COWZ is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of COWZ and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.