Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and FXI

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.7 points.

BOND vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 202632.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.73%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026$8.3bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year −1.4% −19.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.73%
Holdings 1565 51
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 $8.3bn $3.7bn

BOND and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FXI?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.