FLTW vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLTW and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLTW returned +88.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $4.9bn for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF and $4.0bn for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

FLTW costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 102.7 points; FLTW is 1.2 times larger.

FLTWFXI
Expense ratio0.19%0.73%
Net assets$4.9bn$4.0bn
Total return, 1 year+88.8%−13.9%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQFTSE China 50 Index
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund54.1%57.4%
Below its high3.1%, high on Oct 5, 202629.0%, high on Feb 17, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+88.8%
FLTW total return, 1 year
−13.9%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.19%
FLTW expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLTW and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FLTW FXI
Only in FLTW
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD 19.84%
MEDIATEK INC 9.14%
DELTA ELECTRONICS INC 5.51%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY COMPANY LTD 4.48%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO LTD 3.30%
UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP 2.81%
YAGEO CORP 2.62%
ELITE MATERIAL COMPANY LTD 2.48%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.20%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.01%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.91%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.46%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.60%
XIAOMI 4.35%
MEITUAN 4.29%
NETEASE 3.90%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +88.8% −13.9%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +71.5 pts −31.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.73%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 133 52
Net assets $4.9bn $4.0bn

FLTW and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FLTW in plain words

FLTW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +88.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

FXI in plain words

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −13.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 29.0% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLTW or FXI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTW returned +88.8% and FXI −13.9%.
Which is cheaper, FLTW or FXI?
FLTW is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLTW and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FLTW and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLTW against FXI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltw-vs-fxi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.