ASHR vs FLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees

ASHR and FLTW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLTW returned +88.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF and $4.9bn for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.

FLTW costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 88.3 points; FLTW is 3.5 times larger.

ASHRFLTW
Expense ratio0.65%0.19%
Net assets$1.4bn$4.9bn
Total return, 1 year+0.5%+88.8%
What it tracksCSI 300 Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund19.6%54.1%
Below its high24.4%, high on Feb 17, 20213.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+0.5%
ASHR total return, 1 year
+88.8%
FLTW total return, 1 year
0.65%
ASHR expense ratio
0.19%
FLTW expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ASHR and FLTW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ASHR FLTW
Only in ASHR
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO LTD 4.30%
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 2.85%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC LTD 2.62%
KWEICHOW MOUTAI COMPANY LTD 2.20%
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 1.34%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA LTD 1.33%
CAMBRICON TECHNOLOGIES CORP LTD 1.30%
MIDEA GROUP CO LTD 1.25%
Only in FLTW
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD 19.84%
MEDIATEK INC 9.14%
DELTA ELECTRONICS INC 5.51%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY COMPANY LTD 4.48%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO LTD 3.30%
UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP 2.81%
YAGEO CORP 2.62%
ELITE MATERIAL COMPANY LTD 2.48%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +0.5% +88.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −16.7 pts +71.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.19%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 520 133
Net assets $1.4bn $4.9bn

ASHR and FLTW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ASHR in plain words

ASHR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 19.6%. It sat 24.4% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

FLTW in plain words

FLTW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +88.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ASHR or FLTW?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASHR returned +0.5% and FLTW +88.8%.
Which is cheaper, ASHR or FLTW?
FLTW is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ASHR and FLTW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ASHR and 0% of FLTW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ASHR against FLTW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ashr-vs-fltw

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.