EWH vs FLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees
EWH and FLTW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLTW returned +88.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF and $4.9bn for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
FLTW costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 81.5 points; FLTW is 4.1 times larger.
| EWH | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.19% |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $4.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.3% | +88.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI Hong Kong 25/50 Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 70.0% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 8.7%, high on May 13, 2026 | 3.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWH and FLTW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
EWH and FLTW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWH in plain words
EWH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +7.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 29 positions, with the top ten at 70.0%. It sat 8.7% below its high of May 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
FLTW in plain words
FLTW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +88.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWH or FLTW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWH returned +7.3% and FLTW +88.8%.
- Which is cheaper, EWH or FLTW?
- FLTW is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWH against FLTW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewh-vs-fltw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EWH against FLTW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewh-vs-fltw
[EWH against FLTW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewh-vs-fltw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.