EWT vs FLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees
EWT and FLTW hold 79% of their weight in the same names, and FLTW returned +88.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $12.5bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and $4.9bn for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
FLTW costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; EWT is 2.6 times larger.
| EWT | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.19% |
| Net assets | $12.5bn | $4.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.5% | +88.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 79% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 49.4% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and FLTW hold 79% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
79% in common
On the same fields
EWT and FLTW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT in plain words
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +84.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 49.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
FLTW in plain words
FLTW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +88.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or FLTW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.5% and FLTW +88.8%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or FLTW?
- FLTW is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against FLTW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fltw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EWT against FLTW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fltw
[EWT against FLTW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fltw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.