Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWT vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWT and FXI
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $12.0bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and $3.7bn for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
EWT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 89.0 points; EWT is 3.2 times larger.
| Measure | EWT | FXI |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +69.9% | −19.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | 32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | FTSE China 50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.73% |
| Net assets | $12.0bn | $3.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | 58.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 15, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,149 weekly returnsEWT returned more: +995.0% to +196.5%. EWT swung less: 22.8% to 27.3%. EWT fell less at its worst: −57.9% to −68.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWT | FXI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +995.0% | +196.5% | EWT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.4% | +5.0% | EWT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +388.8% | +85.0% | EWT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 22.8% | 27.3% | EWT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.8% | 18.8% | EWT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −57.9% | −68.2% | EWT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.51 | 0.25 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.73 | 0.36 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.20 | 0.07 | EWT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,149 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWT and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT and FXI are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and FXI follows FTSE China 50 Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and FXI −19.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 89.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FXI
FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or FXI?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and FXI −19.1%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or FXI?
- EWT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fxi
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWT against FXI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fxi
[EWT against FXI (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-fxi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.