Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and FXI

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.9bn for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and $3.7bn for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AOR costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.9 points; AOR is 1.1 times larger.

AOR vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.73%
Net assets$3.9bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +7.8% −19.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.73%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 7 51
Net assets $3.9bn $3.7bn

AOR and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or FXI?
AOR is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.