Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs FXI: how they differ
AOR and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AOR returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in FXI |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.88% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.34% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.56% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | XIAOMI 4.83% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | MEITUAN 4.36% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.32% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH 3.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | China Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | −13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.73% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 7 | 53 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or FXI?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and FXI returned −13.8%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or FXI?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against FXI, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-fxi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources