Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to FXI's −19.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and FXI

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.73%
FXI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.70 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.7 points; AGG is far larger, $139.3bn against $3.7bn.

AGG vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGFXI
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−19.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 202032.7%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexFTSE China 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.73%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$139.3bn$3.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 15, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,149 weekly returns
AGG FXI
Return
Total return edge FXI +88.2% +196.5%
Annualized edge FXI +2.9% +5.0%
Price return edge FXI −6.8% +85.0%
Risk
Volatility edge AGG 5.1% 27.3%
Max drawdown edge AGG −18.2% −68.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FXI (slight) 0.23 0.25
Sortino edge FXI 0.30 0.36
Calmar edge AGG 0.16 0.07
Reading

FXI returned more: +196.5% to +88.2%. AGG swung less: 5.1% to 27.3%. AGG fell less at its worst: −18.2% to −68.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AGG vs FXI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGFXIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+88.2%+196.5%FXIPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.9%+5.0%FXITotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−6.8%+85.0%FXIPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.1%27.3%AGGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.8%18.8%AGGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.2%−68.2%AGGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.230.25FXI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.300.36FXIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.160.07AGGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,149 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG FXI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year −1.4% −19.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.73%
Holdings 13469 51
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $3.7bn

AGG and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-EBC924A2C8

AGG and FXI do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. AGG follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and FXI follows FTSE China 50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AGG returned −1.4% and FXI −19.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

AGG and FXI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or FXI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and FXI −19.1%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or FXI?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.70 percentage points a year. That is about $70 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against FXI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-fxi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.