Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and IEFA

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.7 points; IEFA is 1.4 times larger.

AGG vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20204.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$190.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG IEFA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.07%
Holdings 13469 2629
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $190.4bn

AGG and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IEFA?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.