Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs EWT: how they differ
ACWX and EWT hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and EWT hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING | 5.09% | 22.07% |
| MEDIATEK | 0.57% | 7.03% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS | 0.27% | 3.53% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY | 0.26% | 3.28% |
| ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING | 0.18% | 2.79% |
| UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP | 0.14% | 2.09% |
| ELITE MATERIAL | 0.13% | 2.08% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 0.11% | 1.87% |
| FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING | 0.10% | 1.68% |
| NAN YA PLASTICS CORP | 0.10% | 2.04% |
| ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS | 0.09% | 1.86% |
| CATHAY FINANCIAL HOLDING | 0.09% | 1.31% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in EWT |
|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50% | USD CASH 0.13% |
| SK HYNIX 2.04% | CASH COLLATERAL USD BZUFT 0.02% |
| ASML HOLDING 1.77% | |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94% | |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88% | |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79% | |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76% | |
| SHELL PLC 0.70% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | MSCI Taiwan |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +84.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +67.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1515 | 78 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or EWT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or EWT?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against EWT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-ewt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources