CQQQ vs FLTW: Differences, Returns & Fees
CQQQ and FLTW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLTW returned +88.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.4bn for Invesco China Technology ETF and $4.9bn for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
FLTW costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 112.6 points; FLTW is 2.0 times larger.
| CQQQ | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Net assets | $2.4bn | $4.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −23.8% | +88.8% |
| What it tracks | Blended - FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.2% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 58.1%, high on Feb 16, 2021 | 3.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CQQQ and FLTW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
CQQQ and FLTW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CQQQ in plain words
CQQQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −23.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 221 positions, with the top ten at 51.2%. It sat 58.1% below its high of Feb 16, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.
FLTW in plain words
FLTW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +88.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 133 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CQQQ or FLTW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CQQQ returned −23.8% and FLTW +88.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CQQQ or FLTW?
- FLTW is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CQQQ against FLTW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cqqq-vs-fltw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CQQQ against FLTW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cqqq-vs-fltw
[CQQQ against FLTW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cqqq-vs-fltw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.