ASHR vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
ASHR and EWT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned +84.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF and $12.5bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
EWT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 84.0 points; EWT is 9.1 times larger.
| ASHR | EWT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.59% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $12.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +84.5% |
| What it tracks | CSI 300 Index | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 19.6% | 49.4% |
| Below its high | 24.4%, high on Feb 17, 2021 | 3.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ASHR and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
ASHR and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASHR in plain words
ASHR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 19.6%. It sat 24.4% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.
EWT in plain words
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +84.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 49.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ASHR or EWT?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASHR returned +0.5% and EWT +84.5%.
- Which is cheaper, ASHR or EWT?
- EWT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ASHR against EWT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ashr-vs-ewt
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ASHR against EWT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ashr-vs-ewt
[ASHR against EWT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ashr-vs-ewt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.