ASHR vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees

ASHR and EWT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned +84.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF and $12.5bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

EWT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 84.0 points; EWT is 9.1 times larger.

ASHREWT
Expense ratio0.65%0.59%
Net assets$1.4bn$12.5bn
Total return, 1 year+0.5%+84.5%
What it tracksCSI 300 IndexMSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund19.6%49.4%
Below its high24.4%, high on Feb 17, 20213.1%, high on Oct 5, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+0.5%
ASHR total return, 1 year
+84.5%
EWT total return, 1 year
0.65%
ASHR expense ratio
0.59%
EWT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ASHR and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ASHR EWT
Only in ASHR
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO LTD 4.30%
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 2.85%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC LTD 2.62%
KWEICHOW MOUTAI COMPANY LTD 2.20%
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 1.34%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA LTD 1.33%
CAMBRICON TECHNOLOGIES CORP LTD 1.30%
MIDEA GROUP CO LTD 1.25%
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 21.90%
MEDIATEK 6.65%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.94%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.10%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 3.04%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.46%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.28%
ELITE MATERIAL 2.21%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year +0.5% +84.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −16.7 pts +67.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 520 78
Net assets $1.4bn $12.5bn

ASHR and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ASHR in plain words

ASHR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 19.6%. It sat 24.4% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

EWT in plain words

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +84.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 49.4%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ASHR or EWT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ASHR returned +0.5% and EWT +84.5%.
Which is cheaper, ASHR or EWT?
EWT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ASHR and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ASHR and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ASHR against EWT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ashr-vs-ewt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.