Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and IEFA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.7bn for iShares China Large-Cap ETF and $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.4 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.4bn against $3.7bn.

FXI vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20214.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.07%
Net assets$3.7bn$190.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI IEFA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 51 2629
Net assets $3.7bn $190.4bn

FXI and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI and IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.66 percentage points a year. That is about $66 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.