Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to IJH's +13.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and IJH

Net assets: $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares China Large-Cap ETF, and $122.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+13.2%
IJH total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.05%
IJH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJH costs 0.68 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.3 points; IJH is far larger, $122.3bn against $3.7bn.

FXI vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIIJH
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+13.2%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20216.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexS&P MidCap 400
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$3.7bn$122.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%7.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IJH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI IJH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in IJH
OKTA CLASS A 1.10%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.82%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.74%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.67%
ATI 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.65%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.65%
XPO 0.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Tracks the S&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +13.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +12.8% (MDY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.4 pts vs MDY
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 51 409
Net assets, FXI as of Oct 28, 2026 and IJH as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.7bn $122.8bn

FXI and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI and IJH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJH

IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.8% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 409 positions, with the top ten at 7.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IJH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and IJH +13.2%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or IJH?
IJH is cheaper, by 0.68 percentage points a year. That is about $68 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against IJH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-ijh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.