Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FXI vs IWO: how they differ
FXI and IWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.
iShares China Large-Cap ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FXI | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.08% | 0.11% |
| Only in FXI | Only in IWO |
|---|---|
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.88% | MOOG INC CLASS A 0.69% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14% | GLAUKOS 0.65% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.34% | JFROG 0.64% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.56% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.62% |
| XIAOMI 4.83% | FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.62% |
| MEITUAN 4.36% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61% |
| BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.32% | INTERDIGITAL INC 0.60% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH 3.80% | KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | China Large-Cap | Russell 2000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | −13.8% | +17.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −31.3 pts | −0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.73% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 970 |
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 970 positions, with the top ten at 6.2%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IWO?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IWO returned +17.0%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FXI or IWO?
- FXI charges 0.73% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so IWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FXI and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against IWO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-iwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources