Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IWO's +7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and IWO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points; AGG is 10.0 times larger.

AGG vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20209.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexRussell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG IWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.24%
Holdings 13469 1122
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $14.0bn

AGG and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IWO?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.