Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and IWF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; AGG is 1.1 times larger.

AGG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20204.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$124.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG IWF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in IWF
NVIDIA 15.30%
APPLE 8.18%
MICROSOFT 5.94%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
BROADCOM INC 4.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.18%
Holdings 13469 374
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $124.7bn

AGG and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IWF?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.