Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and SCHG

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points.

AGG vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20203.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$139.4bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.04%
Holdings 13469 192
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $139.4bn $63.0bn

AGG and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or SCHG?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.