Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and ONEQ
Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
AGG costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points; AGG is 12.4 times larger.
| Measure | AGG | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $135.7bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or ONEQ?
- AGG is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-oneq
[AGG against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.