Which returned more over the last year, BND or IWF?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BND or IWF?

BND charges 0.03% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BND vs IWF: how they differ

BND is a bond index fund and IWF an equity index fund, and over the year IWF returned more, +7.0% against −0.7%.

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

BND and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	US aggregate bonds	Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+7.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	−10.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.18%
Holdings	not filed	315

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or IWF?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or IWF?: BND charges 0.03% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BND against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources