Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and IWF
Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IWF is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $127.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or IWF?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-iwf
[BSV against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.