Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IGSB vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGSB returned +1.3% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGSB and IWF
Net assets: $23.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IGSB costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IWF is 5.2 times larger.
| Measure | IGSB | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $23.7bn | $123.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 19, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,031 weekly returnsIWF returned more: +955.6% to +72.0%. IGSB swung less: 4.3% to 19.1%. IGSB fell less at its worst: −11.6% to −50.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IGSB | IWF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +72.0% | +955.6% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.8% | +12.6% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +2.8% | +750.1% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 4.3% | 19.1% | IGSB | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 3.3% | 13.2% | IGSB | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −11.6% | −50.4% | IGSB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.29 | 0.63 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.38 | 0.92 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.24 | 0.25 | IWF (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,031 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGSB and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IGSB and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGSB and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IGSB follows ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IGSB holds 4,781 positions and IWF holds 374.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IGSB
IGSB tracks an index of 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.3% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IGSB or IWF?
- IGSB is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGSB against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IGSB against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwf
[IGSB against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.